Atlas Steel Coatings Fined by OSHA

The federal Occupational Safety and Health Administration has cited Atlas Steel Coatings for violations at the company's Albany, Georgia facility last July. OSHA fined the company for failing to train workers on lead hazards, not providing personal protective equipment for workers exposed to lead, not developing a site specific lead compliance plan and not providing showers for workers exposed to lead beyond safe levels.

Atlas was also fined for not providing workers with forklift training and failure to notify workers of their blood lead test results in writing within five days. "This is to prevent workers from transferring lead contamination to their homes or families", said Robert Vazzi, director of OSHA's area office in Savannah. 

Proposed penalties for Atlas Steel total $58,800

Atlanta Police Officer Hit by Truck at Atlanta Medical Center Suffers Work-Related Injuries

On November 11, 2014, a police officer was hit by the driver of a truck while responding to a dispute that arose at Atlanta Medical Center. The incident occurred in the hospital parking deck when the suspect involved in the dispute entered a red truck, and then backed up and drove at the officer. According to Atlanta Police Department spokesperson John Chafee, the injured officer suffered an injury to his hand.

Because the officer’s injuries arose out of and in the course and scope of his employment with the police department, his injuries should be covered by Georgia’s workers’ compensation laws. Here, the officer was responding to a dispute and was working to eliminate the threat being posed at the hospital when he was injured; consequently, a workers’  compensation judge would likely conclude that he was in the course and scope of his employment at the time.


WBT Peanut Company Employee Killed in Front-End Loader Accident

 On October 2, 2014, 61-year-old Isabel ‘Rubin’ Gomez was killed in a front-end loader accident at the WBT Peanut Company in Rebecca, Georgia.

At the time of the incident, Mr. Gomez and his brother were working on the hydraulic system of a front-end loader at the WBT Peanut Company when the lift arms dropped on both men. Mr. Gomez reportedly died from injuries at the scene.

According to media reports, OSHA is now investigating the accident. Among the questions raised by this incident is whether a catastrophic equipment malfunction may have contributed to this tragedy.

If this tragic event was caused by an equipment malfunction, the front-end loader’s manufacturer may be held civilly liable for Mr. Gomez’s wrongful death. Also, because Mr. Gomez was working at the time of this accident, his family is almost certainly entitled to substantial workers’ compensation benefits under Georgia law. 

Given the relatively high number of front-end loader fatalities reported to OSHA each year, equipment manufacturers must implement proper safety precautions in an effort to prevent such disasters. Perhaps though, through these claims, many other lives may be spared.



The Workers' Compensation "Option": Why Opting Out Might Become Very "In"


The Association of Responsible Alternatives to Workers’ Compensation, or ARAWC, is a relatively new organization focused on introducing sweeping changes to traditional state workers’ compensation systems. Specifically, the group (comprised of national employers, insurers, and service providers) seeks to reduce the costs associated with traditional workers’ compensation programs by providing employers with an administrative “Option” for resolving workers’ compensation claims. Two states have already adopted versions of the workers’ compensation opt-outs, and ARAWC is now setting its sights on at least two others. While it’s unclear whether this trend will continue, there’s no denying ARAWC’s commitment to reforming state-based workers’ compensation systems.



Supreme Court of Georgia Denies Benefit Award to Mother for Son's Work Death

The Supreme Court of Georgia upheld a Randolph County court decision that a woman whose adult son was killed while working for the City of Cuthbert is not entitled to her son’s death benefit, despite being his only legal heir. Louise Shorter Barzey argued the Georgia statute preventing her from the compensation is unconstitutional. 

On July 16, 2010, Deron Shorter was operating a mower for the City of Cuthbert when he crashed into a ditch. The mower turned over onto Shorter and he was pronounced dead at the scene.

Prior to working with the city, Shorter worked as a firefighter for 13 years. He was single and did not have children. But he did have a mother, Louise Shorter Barzey, who, under the law, was considered his sole heir.  She was not dependent on her son.  But as his sole legal heir, she filed a lawsuit against the City, claiming she was entitled to his death benefit under the Georgia Workers’ Compensation Act.

The City disagreed, based on a provision of the Act, Official Code of Georgia § 34-9-265, which states that the death benefit for a worker who dies on the job may only be paid to legal dependents.  For the employee who has no dependents, expenses for the employee’s burial “shall be the only compensation,” the statute says.  Barzey argued that distinguishing between dependents and heirs violated her federal constitutional rights to due process and equal protection by precluding her, as a non-dependent parent, from bringing a claim to recover for his death.

In October 2013, the trial court ruled in favor of the City, and Barzey then appealed to the state Supreme Court.

On September 22, 2014 the Supreme Court of Georgia delivered its unanimous opinion. Justice David Nahmias succinctly stated: “We affirm the trial court’s ruling that the Act’s limitation on the recovery of non-dependent heirs does not violate Barzey’s constitutional rights to due process and equal protection.”

A statute “does not violate due process in substance as long as it ‘bear[s] a rational relationship to a legitimate objective of the government,’” the opinion says. Similarly, to survive an equal protection challenge, “the classifications drawn in the statute [must] bear a rational relationship to a legitimate end of government not prohibited by the Constitution.”

Though the Georgia Supreme Court has never ruled on the constitutionality of disallowing non-dependent heirs from recovery under the Workers’ Compensation Act, many courts in other jurisdictions have. “Those courts have consistently held that the legislature may rationally decide to direct workers’ compensation resources to those who are dependent on deceased employees and limit the recovery of non-dependents, and thus the distinction between dependents and non-dependents does not violate federal or state constitutional rights to due process and equal protection,” the opinion provides.


Injured at work? If so, it's time to take a break from social media

In this day and age, most Americans use social media in some form or fashion.  Usually, maintaining and updating a social media account has no impact on user’s life.  However, if you’ve suffered a work injury it’s probably in your best interest to stop using, if not totally shut down, your social media accounts (i.e. Facebook, Twitter, Instagram, Snapchat, YouTube, etc.).  While this course of action may seem extreme, you can be sure that your employer and their workers’ compensation insurance carrier will likely start searching for and monitoring your social media accounts to see if something that has been posted (by you or someone else) will help them in their defense of your workers’ compensation claim.

In fact, there have been cases where information found on social media platforms have led to the nullification of an employee’s workers’ compensation claim.  Some examples include:

A Los Angeles-area warehouse worker who claimed his back injury prevented him from working posted that he bowled a perfect game on his Facebook page.

A beauty queen was receiving workers’ compensation income benefits because of a foot injury she suffered at work.  Shawna Palmer told doctors her fractured toe prevented her from working or, even wearing shoes as a grocery store clerk.  But a YouTube video shows her competing in a beauty pageant in high heels during the time she was receiving the income benefits.  As a result, the benefits were suspended, and she is now being prosecuted for workers’ compensation fraud.  If she’s found guilty, she faces up to one year in jail and may have to pay almost $25,000 in fines.


"Notice" Under the Georgia's Workers' Compensation Act

O.C.G.A. § 34-9-80 requires that every injured employee or his representative shall, immediately on the occurrence of any accident or as soon thereafter as practicable, give or cause to be given to the employer, its agent, representative, foreman, or the immediate supervisor of the injured employee a notice of the accident.  No compensation will be payable unless such notice, either oral or written, is given within thirty (30) days after the occurrence of an accident, or within thirty (30) days after death resulting from an accident, unless it can be shown that the employee had been prevented from doing so by reason of physical or mental incapacity, or by fraud or deceit, or that the employer, its agent, representative, foreman or immediate supervisor of the injured employee had knowledge of the accident, or unless a reasonable excuse is made to the satisfaction of the State Board of Workers' Compensation for not giving such notice and it is reasonably proven to the satisfaction of the Board that the employer had not been prejudiced thereby.

The Georgia Court of Appeals recently tackled whether an employee should be denied benefits under Georgia's Workers' Compensation Act for failing to meet the notice requirement under O.C.G.A. § 34-9-80 in McAdoo v. MARTA, 755 S.E. 2d 278, decided March 11, 2014.  Mr. McAdoo was employed by MARTA as a bus driver.  In May of 2010, Mr. McAdoo began to experience low back pain that caused symptoms in his right lower extremity.  His supervisor urged him to seek medical attention for his back pain because McAdoo was operating the bus differently in order to compensate for his symptoms.  The employee sought treatment with his family physician, who referred him to a neurologist.  Both physicians filled out disability forms indicating the employee's symptoms were not work-related.  The employee went out of work on October 17, 2010.  In December of 2010, the employee filled out a short-term disability form on which he indicated his disability was work related.

The Georgia Court of Appeals held that the short-term disability form completed by the employee (McAdoo) was adequate notice, as the sole requirement is that the information provided by the employee be sufficient to put the employer on notice of injury so that the employer may conduct an investigation.

Golfing To Change Lives at Kids' Chance Golf Tournament

Kids’ Chance of Georgia was started more than 25 years ago. The goal of Kids' Chance is to provide scholarships to children who's parents or legal guardians were catastrophically injured on the job. Since their initiation 25 years ago, they have expanded in 40 states helping thousands of children reach their dreams of getting an education.

Bader Law Firm is a proud supporter of this great organization by participating in the 5k Kids Chance Run every October and this year we will lend a hand to fund those scholarships at the 22nd Annual Golf Tournament which is scheduled to take place at Legacy at Lake Lanier on Sept. 15, 2014.


For more information to get registered for more golfers for the Golf Tournament, please visit

Film Production Company for Greg Allman Biopic "Midnight Rider" Cited by OSHA Following Worker Fatality and Injuries

Sarah Jones, a 27-year-old camera assistant, was killed and eight other workers were injured while trying to avoid an oncoming freight train during the filming of a scene on February 20, 2014 for the movie “Midnight Rider”.  The accident occurred on the Doctortown train trestle in Georgia that spans the Altamaha River near Jesup.  While the crew was filming, a CSX Corp. train traveling on the tracks was observed heading towards them.  Crew members started leaving the tracks, trying to remove set pieces and get off the trestle.  However, they were unable to outrun the approaching train.  The train ultimately struck a hospital bed being used as a set piece, sending debris at Jones and the other workers.  The film, a biopic based on the life of musician Greg Allman began shooting the picture in Georgia on the day of the accident.


On August 14, 2014, the U.S. Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) cited the production for one willful and one serious safety violation.  Per OSHA’s Assistant Secretary of Labor, Dr. David Michaels, “It is unacceptable that Film Allman LLC knowingly exposed their crew to moving trains while filming on a live track and railroad trestle” and that “employers are responsible for taking the necessary precautions to protect workers’ health and safety, and the entertainment industry is no exception.”


OSHA went on to state that the production company’s failure to develop a safety plan to prevent such hazards, including obtaining permission from the rail owner to use the tracks for filming, led to the death of one crew member and injuries to eight other employees.


The movie production company has 15 business days from the date of receipt of OSHA’s citations and proposed penalties to comply or request a conference with OSHA.


Unsportsmanlike Conduct: Female Football Players Sue Lingerie League For Independent Contractor Misclassification

A former Lingerie Football League player has filed a class action lawsuit in a California state court against the all-female professional league (now called the Legends Football League) and it’s founder and chairman Mitchell Mortaza. The lawsuit claims that active and former players were intentionally misclassified as independent contractors instead of employees. The complaint alleges a number of violations of the California wage and hour laws, including failure to pay compensation for all hours worked; failure to pay at least the minimum wage; and failure to pay overtime wages.

The League allegedly mandated attendance at practices, games, and marketing events on dates and at times established by the League and reserved the right to punish or fire players for failure to attend such events; prohibited the players from participating in any outside activities that might result in significant physical injury; and did not allow any negotiation regarding the terms of the independent contractor agreement. Margulies v. Legends Football League, LLC, No. BC550244 (Super. Ct. Cal. June 27, 2014).

As stated in the complaint of the suit, “the designation of the football players as independent contractors was and is clearly improper because the players lack the requisite control and discretion over their job responsibilities and duties to deserve treatment as independent contractors.”  By classifying players as independent contractors, the league was (and still is) able to circumvent applicable wage and hour laws, and deprive them of benefits including workers’ compensation.

Certainly, one can appreciate the importance of workers’ compensation benefits to league football players who are engaging in a contact sport where serious or even catastrophic injuries may occur.